Effects of emotions, grade level and gender on pseudoscience beliefs of secondary school students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol15iss38.22pp49-60pKeywords:
pseudoscience beliefs, secondary school, gender, grade level, emotionsAbstract
Secondary education plays an important role in scientific literacy and, in it, beliefs in pseudoscience have a great relevance. For this reason, the objectives of this study focused on the evaluation of the level of adherence to pseudoscience beliefs of secondary school students, and on the analysis of the influence of gender, grade level and emotions generated in the science classroom on these beliefs. A total of 125 students from three different grades of Spanish secondary education (9th, 10th and 11th grade, between 14 and 17 years old) participated. Two questionnaires, one to evaluate pseudoscientific beliefs, and the other to determine the positive and negative emotions experienced in the science classroom, were administered to participants. From the results obtained through an analysis of the correlations between variables and a regression analysis, it can be concluded that: a) the level of pseudoscience beliefs of students is medium-low and comparable to that of other countries; b) only negative emotions and grade level of students have a significant influence on pseudoscience beliefs, and both have a similar contribution to the variability of these beliefs
Downloads
References
Afonso, A. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). Pseudo-science: a meaningful context for assessing nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903055758
Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
Bensley, D. A., Lilienfeld, S. O., Rowan, K. A., Masciocchi, C. M., & Grain, F. (2020). The generality of belief in unsubstantiated claims. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3581
Blancke, S., Boudry, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2017). Why do irrational beliefs mimic science? The cultural evolution of pseudoscience. Theoria, 83(1), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12109
Boudry, M., Blancke, S., & Pigliucci, M. (2015). What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience. Philosophical Psychology, 28(8), 1177-1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.971946
Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). “Pluto has been a planet my whole life!” Emotions, attitudes, and conceptual change in elementary students’ learning about Pluto’s reclassification. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 529-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9274-x
Bunge, M. (1985). La investigación científica: su estrategia y su filosofía, 2ª edición. Ariel.
Chiang, W. W., & Liu, C. J. (2014). Scale of academic emotion in science education: Development and validation. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 908-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.830233
Cortiñas-Rovira, S., Alonso-Marcos, F., Pont-Sorribes, C., & Escribà-Sales, E. (2015). Science journalists’ perceptions and attitudes to pseudoscience in Spain. Public Understanding of Science, 24(4), 450-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514558991
Ede, A. (2000). Has science education become an enemy of scientific rationality? Skeptical Inquirer, 24, 48–51
Eve, R. A., & Dunn, D. (1990). Psychic powers, astrology & creationism in the classroom? Evidence of pseudoscientific beliefs among high school biology & life science teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 52(1), 10-21.
Fuertes-Prieto, M. Á., Andrés-Sánchez, S., Corrochano-Fernández, D., Urones-Jambrina, C., Delgado-Martín, M. L., Herrero-Teijón, P., & Ruiz, C. (2020). Pre-service Teachers’ False Beliefs in Superstitions and Pseudosciences in Relation to Science and Technology. Science & Education, 29(5), 1235-1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00140-8
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2006). The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.1.5-29
Hobson, A. (2001). Teaching relevant science for scientific literacy. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(4), 238-243. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42991213
Isen, A. M. (2000). Positive affect and decision making. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 417–435). Guilford.
Jeong, J. S., González-Gómez, D., Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016). Students’ perceptions and emotions toward learning in a flipped general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 747-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9630-8
Johnson, R. M. (2003). Is knowledge of science associated with higher skepticism of pseudoscientific claim? University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects. http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj
Johnson, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2004). Is knowledge of science associated with higher skepticism of pseudoscientific claims? The American Biology Teacher, 66(8), 536-548. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451737
Kaplan, A. O. (2014). Research on the pseudo-scientific beliefs of pre-service science teachers: A sample from astronomy-astrology. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(3), 381. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol13/381-393.Oztuna_Kaplan_JBSE_Vol.13_No.3.pdf
Losh, S. C., & Nzekwe, B. (2011). The influence of education major: How diverse preservice teachers view pseudoscience topics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 579-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9297-0
Lundström, M., & Jakobsson, A. (2009). Students’ ideas regarding science and pseudo-science in relation to the human body and health. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 5(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.279
Mercier, H., Majima, Y., & Miton, H. (2018). Willingness to transmit and the spread of pseudoscientific beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(4), 499-505. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3413
Metin, D., Cakiroglu, J., & Leblebicioglu, G. (2020). Perceptions of eighth graders concerning the aim, effectiveness, and scientific basis of pseudoscience: the case of crystal healing. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 175-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9685-4
Mugaloglu, E. Z. (2014). The problem of pseudoscience in science education and implications of constructivist pedagogy. Science & Education, 23(4), 829–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9670-x
Ozgelen, S., Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., & Hanuscin, D.L. (2013). Exploring the development of preservice science teachers’ views on the nature of science in inquiry-based laboratory instruction. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1551-1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9321-2
Peixoto, F., Mata, L., Monteiro, V., Sanches, C., & Pekrun, R. (2015). The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire: Validation for Pre-Adolescent Students. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(4), 472-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1040757
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
Pekrun R. (2007) Emotions in Students’ Scholastic Development. In: Perry R.P., Smart J.C. (Eds) The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective (pp.553-610). Springer.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W. & Perry, R. (2002) ‘Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research’. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Pellicer, I., Solaz-Portolés, J. J., & Sanjosé, V. (2019). Emociones en ciencias y rendimiento en la resolución de problemas: efectos del nivel académico y del género. En T. Sola, M. García, A. Fuentes, A. M. Rodríguez, J. López (Eds.), Innovación educativa en la sociedad digital (pp. 2062-2074). Dykinson.
Piejka, A., & Okruszek, Ł. (2020). Do you believe what you have been told? Morality and scientific literacy as predictors of pseudoscience susceptibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(5), 1072-1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3687
Preece, P. F., & Baxter, J. H. (2000). Skepticism and gullibility: the superstitious and pseudoscientific beliefs of secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050166724
Ranellucci, J., Hall, N. C., & Goetz, T. (2015). Achievement goals, emotions, learning, and performance: A process model. Motivation Science, 1(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000014
Rasmussen, S. C. (2007). The history of science as a tool to identify and confront pseudoscience. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(6), 949. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p949
Ritchie, S. M., Hudson, P., Bellocchi, A., Henderson, S., King, D., & Tobin, K. (2016). Evolution of self-reporting methods for identifying discrete emotions in science classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(3), 577-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9607-y
Solbes, J., Palomar, R., Domínguez, M. C. D. (2017). ¿En qué grado afectan las pseudociencias al profesorado?: una mirada al pensamiento de los docentes de ciencias en formación. Mètode: Revista de Difusión de la Investigación, 96, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.8.9943
Ståhl, T., & Van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.026
Staus, N. L., & Falk, J. H. (2017). The role of emotion in informal science learning: testing an exploratory model. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11(2), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12139
Sugarman, H., Impey, C., Buxner, S., & Antonellis, J. (2011). Astrology beliefs among undergraduate students. Astronomy Education Review, 10, 010101–010101. https://www.as.arizona.edu/cae/download/publications/Buxner011.pdf
Sutter-Brandenberger, C. C., Hagenauer, G., & Hascher, T. (2018). Students’ self-determined motivation and negative emotions in mathematics in lower secondary education—Investigating reciprocal relations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.10.002
Tomas, L., Rigano, D., & Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Students' regulation of their emotions in a science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 234-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21304
Trigwell, K., Ellis, R. A., & Han, F. (2012). Relations between students' approaches to learning, experienced emotions and outcomes of learning. Studies in Higher Education, 37(7), 811-824. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.549220
Tseng, Y. C., Tsai, C. Y., Hsieh, P. Y., Hung, J. F., & Huang, T. C. (2014). The relationship between exposure to pseudoscientific television programmes and pseudoscientific beliefs among Taiwanese university students. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2012.761366
Valiente, C., Swanson, J., & Eisenberg, N. (2012). Linking students’ emotions and academic achievement: When and why emotions matter. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00192.x
Walker, W. R., Hoekstra, S. J., & Vogl, R. J. (2002). Science education is no guarantee of scepticism. Skeptic, 9(3), 24–29.
Wilson, J. A. (2018). Reducing pseudoscientific and paranormal beliefs in university students through a course in science and critical thinking. Science & Education, 27(1-2), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9956-0
Zaboski, B. A., & Therriault, D. J. (2020). Faking science: scientificness, credibility, and belief in pseudoscience. Educational Psychology, 40(7), 820-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1694646
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors can keep the copyright, granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which allow authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in a file open access.
