Relationship between vegetative growth and productionof peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in the Ecuadorian Amazon

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol19iss51.2026pp72-80p

Keywords:

Arachis hypogaea, tropical ecosystem, differentiated fertilization, physiological trade-offs, agricultural productivity

Abstract

Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) are a promising alternative for agricultural diversification in the Ecuadorian Amazon; however, the relationships between vegetative growth and productivity remain poorly explored in humid tropical ecosystems. This study experimentally evaluated, for 75 days after planting, the relationships between morphological parameters and crop productivity variables through field trials under Amazonian soil and climate conditions. An experimental design was implemented with 270 plants distributed across three fertilization treatments (T1: 0.38 g/plant; T2: 0.75 g/plant; T3: 1.50 g/plant), with fortnightly applications. Plant height, stem diameter, number of branches, flowers, and pods were evaluated, as well as pod and seed mass. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance, Tukey's test, and principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed statistically significant differences in plant height (p=8.6e-5) between treatments, indicating a response of vegetative growth to the level of fertilization during the evaluation period. In contrast, no statistically significant differences were observed in seed weight (p=0.263), demonstrating that increased vegetative growth did not translate into increased production in the early stages of cultivation. PCA explained 68.2% of the total variability, identifying a functional differentiation between vegetative and reproductive variables under local conditions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abady, S., Hussein, H., Pasupuleti, J., y Mashilo , J. (2019). Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) improvement in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. CABI digital library, 69(6), 528 -545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1601252

Akram, N., Shafiq, F., y Ashraf, M. (2018). Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): A Prospective Legume Crop to Offer Multiple Health Benefits Under Changing Climate. Comprehersive Reviews, 17, 1325-1338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12383

Asante, M., Dzorgbenyui, B., y Atakora, W. (2020). Respuestas al crecimiento, la nodulación y el rendimiento del maní ( Arachis hypogaea L.) influenciadas por la aplicación combinada de inoculante de Rhizobium y fósforo en la zona de sabana de Guinea de Ghana. International Journal of agronomy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8691757

Bozzer, C., y Cisneros, J. (2024). Análisis espacial multivariado para zonificación por riesgo de erosión eólica en sur de Córdoba. Ciencia del suelo, 42(1). https://ojs.suelos.org.ar/index.php/cds/article/view/844/380

Carvajal, A., Romero, B., Díaz, S., y Santamaría, S. (2025). Identificación de áreas prioritarias para conectar fragmentos boscosos en una zona de los Andes, Colombia. Colombia Forestal, 28(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14483/2256201x.21956

Desmae, H., Sako, D., y Konate, D. (2022). Optimum Plant Density for Increased Groundnut Pod Yield and Economic Benefits in the Semi-Arid Tropics of West Africa. Agronomy, 12(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061474

Dey , R., Pol , K., Bhatt, D., y Chauhan, S. (2004). Growth promotion and yield enhancement of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiological Research(159), 371-394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2004.08.004

Festing, M. (2018). On determining sample size in experiments involving laboratory animal. LAL laboratory Animals, 52(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217738268

Fuentes, S., y Cordovil, J. (2021). Hipótesis sobre el (des) encuentro entre la investigación artística y la investigación científica. Índex, revista de arte contemporáneo, 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26807/cav.vi12.423

Gómez, K., y Gómez , A. (2004). Statistical procedures for agricultural reseaech. https://books.google.com.ec/books?hl=es&lr=&id=PVN7_XRhpdUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=+Statistical+procedures+for+agricultural+research+(2nd+ed.)&ots=Ht878gmut8&sig=Ruvrqqca8IL3Eb58N3NajUnKNDQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Statistical%20procedures%20for%20agricultural%2

Macías , A., Moreira, J., y Muentes, R. (2024). Macronutrientes en el cultivo de maní (Arachis hypogaea L.): una revisión. Revista Científica Agroindustria, Sociedad y Ambiente (A.S.A.), 22, 59 -79. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14433147

Montero, J. (2020). Importancia nutricional y económica del maní (Arachis hypogaea L.). Revista de Investigación e Innovación Agropecuaria y de Recursos Naturales, 7(2). http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?pid=S2409-16182020000200014&script=sci_arttext

Naab, J., Chimphango, S., y Dakora, F. (2009). N2 fixation in cowpea plants grown in farmers’ fields in the Upper West Region of Ghana, measured using15N natural abundance. Symbiosis, 48, 37 - 46. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03179983

Olayinka, B., y Etejere, E. (2015). Growth analysis and yield of two varieties of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by different weed control methods. Plant Physiology reports, 20(2), 130 - 136. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s40502-015-0151-x

Osuna, J., Hernández, S., Pacheco, A., Osuna, T., Parra, S., y Romero, C. (2025). Efecto de la salinidad en poblaciones de chile silvestre del Noroeste de México. Ecosistemas y recursos agropecuarios, 11(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a11n3.4092

Paredes, S., Fernández, R., Ortiz, D., y Huespe, D. (2025). Efecto de la fertilización con nitrógeno y fósforo en mijo perenne: influencia en la producción y calidad forrajera en el sudeste de La Pampa. Semiárida, 7 - 19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19137/semiarida.2025(2).7-18

R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org

Ramírez, L., Luna, Á., Chabla, J., y Gálvez, P. (2023). Modelización del rendimiento con Aquacrop-FAO en el cultivo de maní (Arachis hypogaea L.), Ecuador. Manglar, 20(151 -63). https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.57188/manglar.2023.006

Reyes, J., LLerena, L., Torres, J., Rodríguez, S., y Sariñana, M. (2025). Respuesta Morfológica y Fenológica de Plantas de Chile Pimiento a la Suplementación de Nanopartículas de Selenio. Terra Latinoamericana(43). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v43i.2084

Sánchez, D., Bautista, D., y Cabrera, K. (2024). Uso equivalente de la tierra e índices de crecimiento y eficiencia fisiológica en cultivos intercalados de yuca, maní y maíz. Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, 27(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v27.n2.2024.2603

Song, H., Huang, Y., Ding, L., Duan, Z., y Zhang, J. (2023). Arachis species: High-quality forage crops—nutritional properties and breeding strategies to expand their utilization and feeding value, 23(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/glr2.12059

Valdés, M., Díaz, K., y Hernández, H. (2024). Sistemas agroforestales en la Región Amazónica Ecuatoriana. Ciencia Latina, 8(1), 8587-8613. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i1.10185

Vásquez, S., Villavicencio, E., Guamán, A., Molina, M., y Mestanza, C. (2024). Efecto de la densidad de plantas sobre los componentes del rendimiento de fréjol cultivado en condiciones de campo en un valle interandino de Ecuador. LA GRANJA. Revista de Ciencias de la Vida, 39(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17163/lgr.n39.2024.10

Zhang, H., Wang, L., Xiuliang, J., Liming, B., y Yufeng, G. (2023). High-throughput phenotyping of plant leaf morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits on multiple scales using optical sensing. The Crop Journal, 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2023.04.014

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Relationship between vegetative growth and productionof peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in the Ecuadorian Amazon. (2026). CIENCIA UNEMI, 19(51), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol19iss51.2026pp72-80p