Ecological footprint and bioproductive zones. A look from the Ecuadorian economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol17iss44.2024pp52-64pKeywords:
Ecological footprint, biocapacity, grasslands, fishing areas, natural resourcesAbstract
The ecological footprint is a measure of the consumption of natural resources to meet the needs of the population or the amount of biocapacity to absorb the waste generated and CO2 absorption by humans; it is measured in global hectares (hag). The present study aims to determine the degree of affectation in global hectares produced in Ecuador from 2008 to 2018. It is longitudinal research of descriptive-explanatory type, non-experimental, with non-probabilistic sampling. The data were collected from the Ministry of Environment, Water and Ecological Transition, from the section called "National System of Environmental Indicators and Sustainability" (SINIAS). For its analysis, descriptive, correlational and multivariate statistics were considered through a correspondence analysis. It is concluded that over time the affectation of bioproductive zones continues to grow and that the Ecuadorian ecological footprint for the year 2022 has a surplus of 0.2 hag per capita.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., & Cary, M. (2021). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecological Indicators, 121, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060
Alnour, M., Ali, M., Abdalla, A., Abdelrahman, R., & Khalil, H. (2022). How do urban population growth, hydropower consumption and natural resources rent shape environmental quality in Sudan? World Development Sustainability, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100029
Amer, E. A. A. A., Meyad, E. M. A., Gao, Y., Niu, X., Chen, N., Xu, H., & Zhang, D. (2022). Exploring the link between natural resources, urbanization, human capital, and ecological footprint: A case of GCC countries. Ecological Indicators, 144, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109556
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Topaloglu, E. E., Nur, T., & Evcimen, C. (2023). Exploring the linkage between financial development and ecological footprint in APEC countries: A novel view under corruption perception and environmental policy stringency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137686
Banco Central del Ecuador. (2023). Informe de resultados de comercio exterior. Primer trimestre de 2023. https://contenido.bce.fin.ec/documentos/Estadisticas/SectorExterno/ComercioExterior/informes/ResultCE_012023.pdf
Bashir, M. A., Dengfeng, Z., Filipiak, B. Z., Bilan, Y., & Vasa, L. (2023). Role of economic complexity and technological innovation for ecological footprint in newly industrialized countries: Does geothermal energy consumption matter? Renewable Energy, 217, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119059
Bi, M., Yao, C., Xie, G., Liu, J., & Qin, K. (2021a). Improvement and application of the three-dimensional ecological footprint model. Ecological Indicators, 125, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107480
Bi, M., Yao, C., Xie, G., Liu, J., & Qin, K. (2021b). Improvement and application of the three-dimensional ecological footprint model. Ecological Indicators, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107480
Casals Miralles, C., Barioni, D., Mancini, M. S., Colón Jordà, J., Boy Roura, M., Ponsá Salas, S., Llenas Argelaguet, L., & Galli, A. (2023). The Footprint of tourism: a review of Water, Carbon, and Ecological Footprint applications to the tourism sector. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 422, pp. 1–16). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138568
Dai, J., Ouyang, Y., Hou, J., & Cai, L. (2023). Long-time series assessment of the sustainable development of Xiamen City in China based on ecological footprint calculations. Ecological Indicators, 148, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110130
Dembińska, I., Kauf, S., Tłuczak, A., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Marzantowicz, Ł., & Ioppolo, G. (2022). The impact of space development structure on the level of ecological footprint - Shift share analysis for European Union countries. Science of the Total Environment, 851, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157936
Doytch, N. (2020). The impact of foreign direct investment on the ecological footprints of nations. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100085
Erdogan, S., & Okumus, I. (2021). Stochastic and club convergence of ecological footprint: An empirical analysis for different income group of countries. Ecological Indicators, 121, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107123
García de Salamone, I. E. (2022). Microbiology, Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development Goals. Revista Argentina de Microbiología, 54, 71–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2022.05.007
Global Footprint Network. (2023). Ecological Footprint. Global Footprint Network. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/
González Gaudiano, E. J., Meira-Cartea, P. Á., & Martínez-Fernández, C. N. (2015). Sustentabilidad y Universidad: retos, ritos y posibles rutas. Revista de La Educación Superior, RESU, 44(175), 69–93.
Ihobe. (2019). Huella ecológica de Euskadi. Sociedad Pública de Gestión Ambiental.
Kok, A. L., & Barendregt, W. (2021). Understanding the adoption, use, and effects of ecological footprint calculators among Dutch citizens. Journal of Cleaner Production, 326, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129341
Kong, F., Cui, W., & Xi, H. (2021). Spatial–temporal variation, decoupling effects and prediction of marine fishery based on modified ecological footprint model: Case study of 11 coastal provinces in China. Ecological Indicators, 132, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108271
Li, P., Zhang, R., & Xu, L. (2021). Three-dimensional ecological footprint based on ecosystem service value and their Drivers: A case study of Urumqi. Ecological Indicators, 131, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108117
Li, X., Li, S., Li, C., Shi, J., & Wang, N. (2023). The impact of high-quality development on ecological footprint: An empirical research based on STIRPAT model. Ecological Indicators, 154, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110881
Liu, T., Wang, H. Z., Wang, H. Z., & Xu, H. (2021). The spatiotemporal evolution of ecological security in China based on the ecological footprint model with localization of parameters. Ecological Indicators, 126, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107636
Lv, T., Zeng, C., Stringer, L. C., Yang, J., & Wang, P. (2021). The spatial spillover effect of transportation networks on ecological footprint. Ecological Indicators, 132, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108309
Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador. (2017). Boletín Nro. 1. Huella ecológica del Ecuador. Principales avances y resultados.
Mondragón Barrera, M. A. (2014). Uso de la correlación de Spearman en un estudio de intervención en fisioterapia. Movimiento Científico, 8(1), 98–104. https://revmovimientocientifico.ibero.edu.co/article/view/mct.08111/645
Salman, M., Zha, D., & Wang, G. (2022). Indigenous versus foreign innovation and ecological footprint: Dynamic threshold effect of corruption. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100177
Świąder, M., Lin, D., Szewrański, S., Kazak, J. K., Iha, K., van Hoof, J., Belčáková, I., & Altiok, S. (2020). The application of ecological footprint and biocapacity for environmental carrying capacity assessment: A new approach for European cities. Environmental Science and Policy, 105, 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.010
Tobasura Acuña, I. (2008). Huella ecológica y biocapacidad: indicadores biofísicos para la gestión ambiental. El caso de Manizales, Colombia. Luna Azul, 26, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2008.26.8
Uribe-Saldarriaga, C. M. (2014a). Green marketing of a golden company. Estudios Gerenciales, 30(130), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.11.003
Uribe-Saldarriaga, C. M. (2014b). Mercadeo verde de una empresa dorada. Estudios Gerenciales, 30(130), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.11.003
Xie, B., Zhang, X., Lu, J., Liu, F., & Fan, Y. (2022). Research on ecological evaluation of Shanghai port logistics based on emergy ecological footprint models. Ecological Indicators, 139, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108916
Yang, Y., Wang, H., Li, Y., Zhang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2023). New green development indicator of water resources system based on an improved water resources ecological footprint and its application. Ecological Indicators, 148, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110115
Zhang, R., Li, P., & Xu, L. (2022). Evaluation and analysis of ecological security based on the improved three-dimensional ecological footprint in Shaanxi Province, China. Ecological Indicators, 144, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109483
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors can keep the copyright, granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which allow authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in a file open access.
