Huella ecológica y zonas bioproductivas. Una mirada desde la economía ecuatoriana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol17iss44.2024pp52-64pPalabras clave:
Huella ecológica, biocapacidad, pastizales, zonas de pesca, recursos naturalesResumen
La huella ecológica es una medida del consumo de recursos naturales para satisfacer las necesidades de la población o la cantidad de biocapacidad para absorber los desechos generados y absorción de CO2 por el ser humano; se mide en hectáreas globales (hag). El presente estudio tiene como finalidad determinar el grado de afectación en hectáreas globales producidas en el Ecuador desde el año 2008 hasta el año 2018. Se trata de una investigación de corte longitudinal de tipo descriptiva-explicativa, no experimental, con muestreo no probabilístico. Los datos fueron recogidos del Ministerio del Ambiente, Agua y Transición Ecológica, desde el apartado denominado “Sistema Nacional de Indicadores Ambientales y Sostenibilidad” (SINIAS). Para su análisis se consideró la estadística descriptiva, correlacional y multivariante a través de un análisis de correspondencias. Se concluye que a lo largo del tiempo la afectación a las zonas bioproductivas sigue en crecimiento y que la huella ecológica ecuatoriana para el año 2022, tiene un superávit de 0,2 hag per cápita.
Descargas
Referencias
Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., & Cary, M. (2021). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecological Indicators, 121, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060
Alnour, M., Ali, M., Abdalla, A., Abdelrahman, R., & Khalil, H. (2022). How do urban population growth, hydropower consumption and natural resources rent shape environmental quality in Sudan? World Development Sustainability, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100029
Amer, E. A. A. A., Meyad, E. M. A., Gao, Y., Niu, X., Chen, N., Xu, H., & Zhang, D. (2022). Exploring the link between natural resources, urbanization, human capital, and ecological footprint: A case of GCC countries. Ecological Indicators, 144, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109556
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Topaloglu, E. E., Nur, T., & Evcimen, C. (2023). Exploring the linkage between financial development and ecological footprint in APEC countries: A novel view under corruption perception and environmental policy stringency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137686
Banco Central del Ecuador. (2023). Informe de resultados de comercio exterior. Primer trimestre de 2023. https://contenido.bce.fin.ec/documentos/Estadisticas/SectorExterno/ComercioExterior/informes/ResultCE_012023.pdf
Bashir, M. A., Dengfeng, Z., Filipiak, B. Z., Bilan, Y., & Vasa, L. (2023). Role of economic complexity and technological innovation for ecological footprint in newly industrialized countries: Does geothermal energy consumption matter? Renewable Energy, 217, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119059
Bi, M., Yao, C., Xie, G., Liu, J., & Qin, K. (2021a). Improvement and application of the three-dimensional ecological footprint model. Ecological Indicators, 125, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107480
Bi, M., Yao, C., Xie, G., Liu, J., & Qin, K. (2021b). Improvement and application of the three-dimensional ecological footprint model. Ecological Indicators, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107480
Casals Miralles, C., Barioni, D., Mancini, M. S., Colón Jordà, J., Boy Roura, M., Ponsá Salas, S., Llenas Argelaguet, L., & Galli, A. (2023). The Footprint of tourism: a review of Water, Carbon, and Ecological Footprint applications to the tourism sector. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 422, pp. 1–16). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138568
Dai, J., Ouyang, Y., Hou, J., & Cai, L. (2023). Long-time series assessment of the sustainable development of Xiamen City in China based on ecological footprint calculations. Ecological Indicators, 148, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110130
Dembińska, I., Kauf, S., Tłuczak, A., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Marzantowicz, Ł., & Ioppolo, G. (2022). The impact of space development structure on the level of ecological footprint - Shift share analysis for European Union countries. Science of the Total Environment, 851, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157936
Doytch, N. (2020). The impact of foreign direct investment on the ecological footprints of nations. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100085
Erdogan, S., & Okumus, I. (2021). Stochastic and club convergence of ecological footprint: An empirical analysis for different income group of countries. Ecological Indicators, 121, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107123
García de Salamone, I. E. (2022). Microbiology, Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development Goals. Revista Argentina de Microbiología, 54, 71–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2022.05.007
Global Footprint Network. (2023). Ecological Footprint. Global Footprint Network. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/
González Gaudiano, E. J., Meira-Cartea, P. Á., & Martínez-Fernández, C. N. (2015). Sustentabilidad y Universidad: retos, ritos y posibles rutas. Revista de La Educación Superior, RESU, 44(175), 69–93.
Ihobe. (2019). Huella ecológica de Euskadi. Sociedad Pública de Gestión Ambiental.
Kok, A. L., & Barendregt, W. (2021). Understanding the adoption, use, and effects of ecological footprint calculators among Dutch citizens. Journal of Cleaner Production, 326, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129341
Kong, F., Cui, W., & Xi, H. (2021). Spatial–temporal variation, decoupling effects and prediction of marine fishery based on modified ecological footprint model: Case study of 11 coastal provinces in China. Ecological Indicators, 132, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108271
Li, P., Zhang, R., & Xu, L. (2021). Three-dimensional ecological footprint based on ecosystem service value and their Drivers: A case study of Urumqi. Ecological Indicators, 131, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108117
Li, X., Li, S., Li, C., Shi, J., & Wang, N. (2023). The impact of high-quality development on ecological footprint: An empirical research based on STIRPAT model. Ecological Indicators, 154, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110881
Liu, T., Wang, H. Z., Wang, H. Z., & Xu, H. (2021). The spatiotemporal evolution of ecological security in China based on the ecological footprint model with localization of parameters. Ecological Indicators, 126, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107636
Lv, T., Zeng, C., Stringer, L. C., Yang, J., & Wang, P. (2021). The spatial spillover effect of transportation networks on ecological footprint. Ecological Indicators, 132, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108309
Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador. (2017). Boletín Nro. 1. Huella ecológica del Ecuador. Principales avances y resultados.
Mondragón Barrera, M. A. (2014). Uso de la correlación de Spearman en un estudio de intervención en fisioterapia. Movimiento Científico, 8(1), 98–104. https://revmovimientocientifico.ibero.edu.co/article/view/mct.08111/645
Salman, M., Zha, D., & Wang, G. (2022). Indigenous versus foreign innovation and ecological footprint: Dynamic threshold effect of corruption. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100177
Świąder, M., Lin, D., Szewrański, S., Kazak, J. K., Iha, K., van Hoof, J., Belčáková, I., & Altiok, S. (2020). The application of ecological footprint and biocapacity for environmental carrying capacity assessment: A new approach for European cities. Environmental Science and Policy, 105, 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.010
Tobasura Acuña, I. (2008). Huella ecológica y biocapacidad: indicadores biofísicos para la gestión ambiental. El caso de Manizales, Colombia. Luna Azul, 26, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2008.26.8
Uribe-Saldarriaga, C. M. (2014a). Green marketing of a golden company. Estudios Gerenciales, 30(130), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.11.003
Uribe-Saldarriaga, C. M. (2014b). Mercadeo verde de una empresa dorada. Estudios Gerenciales, 30(130), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.11.003
Xie, B., Zhang, X., Lu, J., Liu, F., & Fan, Y. (2022). Research on ecological evaluation of Shanghai port logistics based on emergy ecological footprint models. Ecological Indicators, 139, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108916
Yang, Y., Wang, H., Li, Y., Zhang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2023). New green development indicator of water resources system based on an improved water resources ecological footprint and its application. Ecological Indicators, 148, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110115
Zhang, R., Li, P., & Xu, L. (2022). Evaluation and analysis of ecological security based on the improved three-dimensional ecological footprint in Shaanxi Province, China. Ecological Indicators, 144, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109483
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los autores pueden mantener el copyright, concediendo a la revista el derecho de primera publicación. Alternativamente, los autores pueden transferir el copyright a la revista, la cual permitirá a los autores el uso no-comercial del trabajo, incluyendo el derecho a colocarlo en un archivo de acceso libre.
