THE APPLICATION OF SUSPENDED SENTENCES AND THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY OF TREATMENT IN FORM
Abstract
The present investigation analyzes the contradiction present in Art. 630, numeral 1, of the COIP. Which states that, the custodial sentence may be suspended under certain conditions, as long as the penalty foreseen for the crime does not exceed five years. However, such provision goes against Article 66, numeral 4 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to formal equality. However, it is important to take into account the principle of legality and to consider the suspension of the sentence in a specific and not general manner. According to the interpretation of Article 13 of the COIP, the norms must be interpreted in a comprehensive manner and in line with the Constitution of the Republic and international human rights instruments. Therefore, the objective of the research is to determine the affectation, in the cases in which the request for conditional suspension of the sentence is denied based on the fact that the sentence in abstract is from 5 to 7 years and if the same with the principles of equality and non-discrimination established in the Constitution and international human rights treaties. The methodology applied to the research is qualitative and descriptive theoretical, since it allows the collection of information based on the normative and jurisprudential reality. Key words: Conditional suspension of sentence, formal equality, right to freedom, normative contradiction, abstract penalties, concrete penalties.Downloads
References
Abreu, M. (1985). Suspensión condicional de la pena y probation. Madrid: Ministerio de Justicia.
Asamblea Nacional. (29 de 03 de 2023). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Quito, Ecuador: Registro Oficial Suplemento 180. Obtenido de Obtenido de: https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/03/COIP_act_feb-2021.pdf
Beccaria, M. (1828). Tratado de los delitos y de las penas. París: En casa de Rosa, librero.
Bernal, C. (2019). El Derecho de los Derechos. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Botero Bernal, A. (2019). La metodología docuemntal en la investigación jurídica: alcances y perspectivas. Colombia: Opinión Jurídica.
Cabrera, D. M. (2019). Igualdad jurídica o igualdad material, ¿qué va antes el huevo o la gallina? Madrid: Anuario de Derechos Humanos.
Caso Usón Ramírez Vs Venezuela (Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos 20 de noviembre de 2009).
Endara, N. (2018). La suspensión condicional del procedimiento y suspensión. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar.
Galarza Castro, C. X., & Campaña Hurtado, R. X. (2022). principio de igualdad formal enlas personas extranjeras y el accesoa las acciones constitucionales. Revista Ciencia UNEMI, 96 - 103. doi:https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-7737vol15iss40.2022pp96-103p
Hernández Sampieri, R. (2017). Metodología de la investigación. Mexico: Mc Graw Hill.
Mujica, R. (2022). Trascender Metodológico: Epistemología, Perspectivas Teóricas y Metodológicas de la Investigación Digital. Revista tecnológica educativa Docentes. Obtenido de https://ojs.docentes20.com/index.php/revista-docentes20/article/view/289
Reyes, E. (2022). Metodología de la investigación científica. Scielo.
Sentencia nº 019-16-SIN-CC , Caso No. 0090-15-IN (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador marzo de 22 de 2016).
Sentencia No. 50-21-CN/22 y acumulado, CASO No. 50-21-CN y acumulado (Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 19 de octubre de 2022).
Copyright (c) 2024 Science Magazine Unemi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors can keep the copyright, granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which allow authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in a file open access.
