A A Machiavellian personality trait study of Millennials in Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2602-8379vol4iss7.2020pp53-64pKeywords:
Machiavellian personality, millennials, socio-economic level, gender, psychological health, manipulation, deceptionAbstract
Machiavellian studies have been conducted across the globe since the Mach IV test was demonstrated to be reliable by Christie and Geis. It has been an important measure in many fields particularly related to the workplace. In Ecuador, and across the globe, Millennial are beginning to make up a large portion of the workforce. To date, in Ecuador, there have been no publications of Machiavellian scores on this demographic, leaving management with one less valuable tool to better understand this cohort. This study provides a basis for research in this field in Ecuador. The Mach IV instrument was translated into Spanish, with the local Ecuadorian dialect in mind and tested for clarity. The survey was completed by 440 millennial university students from Guayaquil. Additional factors were obtained in order to test their impact on students´ Mach scores including gender and subjective socio-economic level. Gender differences in Mach scores of populations across the world have shown to be inconsistent, where in some populations there are large difference and in other studies there are no significant difference shown. Additionally, Ecuador is a socially stratified country where there are expected differences in personality based on socio-economic level. The study concludes that there are no statistically significant differences in Mach scores of university students from Guayaquil and gender, nor socio-economic level.
Downloads
References
Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 768-776. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768
Aziz, A., and Vallejo, D. (2007). An exploratory study of the facets of Type A personality and scores on the Machiavellian Behavior (Mach-B) scale. Psychological Reports, 101(2), 555-560. doi:10.2466/pr0.101.2.555-560
Bencsik, A., Juhász, T., & Horváth-Csikós, G. (2016). Y and Z generations at workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 6(3), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
Brewer, G., Abell, L., & Lyons, M. (2014). Machiavellianism, competition and self-disclosure in friendship. Individual Differences Research, 12(1), 1-7. doi:1541-745X
Burns, D. J., Tackett, J. A., & Wolf, F. (2015). The effectiveness of instruction in accounting ethics education: Another look. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 149-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1574-076520150000019015
CEMDES. (2015). Los millennial en el Ecuador. www.cemdes.org
Chabrol, H., Van Leeuwen, N., Rodgers, R., and Séjourné, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7), 734-739. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020
Christie, R., and Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
Corzine, J. B. (1997). Machiavellianism and management: A review of single-nation studies exclusive of the USA and cross-national studies. Psychological Reports, 80(1), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.80.1.291
Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2008). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318618
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2016). Social role theory of sex differences. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183
Geis, F. L., & Moon, T. H. (1981). Machiavellianism and deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 766-775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.766
Graham, J. (1996). Machiavellian project managers: do they perform better? International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), 67-74.doi:10.1016/0263-7863(95)00061-5
INEC. (2010). Projecciones poblacionales. www.ecuadorcifras.gob.ec
Jakobwitz, S., and Egan, V. (2006). The Dark Triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331–339.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellism. In Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 253-273). New York: The Guilford Press.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 679- 682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.011
Kaestner, E., Rosen, L., Appel, P., & Sofer, S. (1977). Manipulativeness among drug abusers:
Reliability and validity of the Mach IV scale. British Journal of Addiction, 72(3), 245-249. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1977.tb00685.x
Machiavelli, N. (1993). The Prince. Wordsworth Editions Ltd.
Miller, B. K., Smart, D. L., & Rechner, P. L. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the machiavellian personality scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.022
Mohsen, T and Reg, D. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55, DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social class, culture, and the convergence of resources and rank. PsycEXTRA Dataset, 20(4), 246-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/e634112013-188
Paulhus, D. L., and Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.
Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). Towards multifaceted machiavellianism: Content, factorial, and construct validity of a German machiavellianism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 345-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.038
Shamsudheen, S. P., D, Bishmi. P.D, & Appu, A. V. (2017). A study of emotional maturity and self-control on machiavellianism among office workers. Indian Journal of Health and Well-being, 8(11), 1325-1334. Retrieved from http://www.iahrw.com/index.php/home/journal_detail/19#list
SENESCYT. (2015). Información estadística sobre educación superior, ciencia, tecnología e innovación. https://www.educacionsuperior.gob.ec/
Starr, P. D. (1975). Machiavellianism among traditional and westernized Arab students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 96(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1975.9923283
Szijjarto, L., & Bereczkei, T. (2014). The machiavellians’ “Cool syndrome”: They experience intensive feelings but have difficulties in expressing their emotions. Current Psychology, 34(2), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9262-1
Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2012). Agentic and communal values: Their scope and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627968
Turner, C. F., & Martinez, D. C. (1977). Socioeconomic achievement and the machiavellian personality. Sociometry, 40(4), 325. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033481
Tusev, A. (2019). The next generation of professionals in Ecuador: A manager´s guide to Millennial/Generation Z university students. UEES.
Vleeming, R. G. (1979). Machiavellianism: A preliminary review. Psychological Reports, 44(1), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.44.1.295
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los artículos de la Revista FACSalud UNEMI son difundidos bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor, y, por lo tanto, son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes: Reconocer los créditos de la obra especificada por el autor e indicar si se realizaron cambios (puede hacerlo de cualquier forma razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que el autor respalda el uso que hace de su obra. No utilizar la obra para fines comerciales. En caso de remezcla, transformación o desarrollo, no puede distribuirse el material modificado.
