¿Do You Trust the Source? Credibility Perception of Documentary and Non-Documentary Sources in College Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2602-8379vol4iss7.2020pp40-52pKeywords:
Credibility, evaluation, sourcing, comprehension, digital readingAbstract
To examine the perception of source credibility as a function of the sources’ features in a sample of university students. Methodology: experimental, cross-sectional design. Procedure: 120 psychology students (age M = 20.64, SD = 4.05, 80.4 % female) assessed the credibility of seven different sources (four documentary and three non-documentary sources) in terms of pertinence to provide information on a rare medical issue. Results: Three main results were found. First, credibility assessment was influenced by the source features (e.g., expertise, first-hand information, editorial filters). Second, some features resulted more prominent than others. Third, prior domain knowledge affected the influence of the features on the assessment. Conclusions: The results provide insight on how different source parameters or features influence the credibility evaluation. These results can serve as a potential guideline for interventions aimed at promoting the critical evaluation of documents.
Downloads
References
Braasch, J., Bråten, I. & McCrudden, M. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of Multiple Source Use. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627496
Bråten, I., & Braasch, J. L. (2018). The role of conflict in multiple source use. En J. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. McCrudden (Eds.) Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 184-201).Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627496
Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., Brandmo, C., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 30, 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.11.002
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 180-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.002
Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and instruction, 20(4), 485-522. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., & Durik, A. (2018). Representations and processes in multiple source use. In Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 17-33). Routledge.
Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T. (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) to be attained from others. En L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom (pp. 163–193). Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511691904.006
Burin, D. I. (2020). Comprensión de texto digital. En Burin (ed.). La competencia lectora a principios del SXXI: texto, multimedia e internet (pp. 70-100) Buenos Aires: Teseo
Burin, D. I., Irrazabal, N., Ricle, I., Saux, G., & Barreyro, J. P. (2018). Self-reported internet skills, previous knowledge and working memory in text comprehension in E-learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0099-9
Chung, M., Oden, R. P., Joyner, B. L., Sims, A., & Moon, R. Y. (2012). Safe infant sleep recommendations on the Internet: let's Google it. The Journal of pediatrics, 161(6), 1080-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.004
Delarbre, R. T. (2001). Vivir en la Sociedad de la Información Orden global y dimensiones locales en el universo digital. Revista iberoamericana deficiencia, tecnología, sociedad e innovación, 1.
Fajardo, I., Villalta, E., & Salmerón, L. (2016). ¿Son realmente tan buenos los nativos digitales? Relación entre las habilidades digitales y la lectura digital. Anales de Psicología, 32, 89-97.
Ganaie, S. A., & Khazer, M. (2015) Diversity of information sources in the digital age: An overview. Journal of Advancements in Library Sciences. 2(2): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.37591/joals.v2i2.388
International Telecommunication Union (2019). Measuring digital development facts and figures, ITU, Geneva.
International Telecommunication Union (2019), Yearbook of Statistics, Telecommunication/ICT Indicators 2009-2018, ITU, Geneva.
Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2014). The Role of Search Result Position and Source Trustworthiness in the Selection of Web Search Results When Using a List or a Grid Interface. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.846790
Kammerer, Y., Bråten, I., Gerjets, P., & Strømsø, H. I. (2013). The role of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons’ source evaluations and decisions during Web search on a medical issue. Computers in human behavior, 29(3), 1193-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.012
Kammerer, Y., Meier, N., & Stahl, E. (2016). Fostering secondary-school students’ intertext model formation when reading a set of websites: The effectiveness of source prompts. Computers & Education, 102, 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.001
Khademian, F., Montazer, M.R., & Aslani, A. (2020). Web-based health Information Seeking and eHealth Literacy among College students. A Self-report study. Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria, 38 1.
Kortum, P., Edwards, C., & Richards-Kortum, R. (2008). The impact of inaccurate Internet health information in a secondary school learning environment. Journal of medical Internet research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.986
List, A., Alexander, P. A., & Stephens, L. A. (2017). Trust but verify: Examining the association between students' sourcing behaviors and ratings of text trustworthiness. Discourse Processes, 54(2), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1174654
List, A., Van Meter, P., Kendeou, P., & Lombardi, D., (2020) Loggers and Conservationists: Navigating the Multiple Resource Forest Through the Trees, En P. Van Meter, A. List, D. Lombardi & P. Kendeou (eds.), Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives. Abingson, Inglaterra: Routledge
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International journal of educational research, 58, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
Mathur, S., Shanti, N., Brkaric, M., Sood, V., Kubeck, J., Paulino, C., & Merola, A. A. (2005). Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet. Spine, 30(23), 2695-2700. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000188266.22041.c2
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and instruction, 14(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
Naumann, J., & Salmerón, L. (2016). ¿Acaso la navegación siempre predice el desempeño? Los efectos de la navegación en la lectura digital son moderados por las habilidades de comprensión. Revista Mexicana de bachillerato a distancia, 16, 132-155.
OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2020, 2 de febrero). Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Situation report - 13. Recuperado de https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pdf
Ortega J, Vázquez N, Samaniego VC & Arberas C (2016) Alfabetización en genética en una muestra de 145 estudiantes de los primeros años de las carreras de psicología y medicina. VII Jornada de Intercambio Académico y de Investigación, UCA
Pérez, A., Potocki, A., Stadtler, M., Macedo-Rouet, M., Paul, J., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J. F. (2018). Fostering teenagers' assessment of information reliability: Effects of a classroom intervention focused on critical source dimensions. Learning and Instruction, 58, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.006
Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. The construction of mental representations during reading, 88108.
Resolución N° 2857. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 11 de diciembre de 2006. Recuperado de: http://convocatorias.conicet.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/RD-20061211-2857.pdf
Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and instruction, 15(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3
Rouet, J. F., Skov, O., De Pereyra, G., Ros, C., Le Bigot, L., & Vibert, N. (2018). Relevance versus big numbers: Students’ criteria for selecting scholarly references online. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(4), 476. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000194
Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M.A., & Potocki, A. (2019). Multiple-text comprehension. In J. Dunlosky & K. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education (pp. 356-380). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235631.015
Sabatini, J. P., O'reilly, T., Halderman, L., & Bruce, K. (2014). Broadening the scope of reading comprehension using scenario-based assessments: Preliminary findings and challenges. L'Année Psychologique, 114(4), 693–723. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503314004059
Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H., Kammerer, Y., Stadtler, M., & van den Broek, P., (2018). Comprehension processes in digital reading, En M. Barzillai, J. Thompson, S. Schroeder & P. van den Broek (eds.), Learning to read in a digital world. Amsterdam, Países Bajos: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Saux, G. (2020). Modelos cognitivos de la comprensión de múltiples textos. En Burin (ed.). La competencia lectora a principios del SXXI: texto, multimedia e internet (pp. 101-131). Buenos Aires: Teseo.
Saux, G., Ros, C., Britt, M. A., Stadtler, M., Burin, D. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2018). Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands. Discourse Processes, 55(5-6), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722
Stadtler, M., Paul, J., Globoschütz, S., & Bromme, R. (2015). Watch out! - An instruction raising students’ epistemic vigilance augments their sourcing activities. En D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2278–2283). Austin, Estados Unidos: Cognitive Science Society.
Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content-source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. En D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). Cambridge, Inglaterra: MIT Press.
Van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014). Modeling traditional literacy, Internet skills and Internet usage: An empirical study. Interacting with computers, 28(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu027
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los artículos de la Revista FACSalud UNEMI son difundidos bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor, y, por lo tanto, son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes: Reconocer los créditos de la obra especificada por el autor e indicar si se realizaron cambios (puede hacerlo de cualquier forma razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que el autor respalda el uso que hace de su obra. No utilizar la obra para fines comerciales. En caso de remezcla, transformación o desarrollo, no puede distribuirse el material modificado.
