INTERPERSONAL REACTIVITY INDEX: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PERFORMANCE AMONG MEN AND WOMEN FROM BUENOS AIRES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2602-8379vol7iss12.2023pp35-44p

Keywords:

empathy, gender, interpersonal, Reactivity Index

Abstract

Abstract: Previous research has shown that gender influences the scores obtained by healthy subjects on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) empathy scale. Currently, little is known about this topic in adult individuals from Buenos Aires. Objective: To compare the performance of healthy adults, from Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires and Gran Buenos Aires, on a scale that assesses empathy in order to analyse the effect that gender has on said performance. Method: The IRI scale was administered to a sample of 90 subjects (56 women and 34 men) to assess whether there is a difference in their empathic ability based on gender. Results: The data showed that women obtained higher scores on the Fantasy and Empathic Concern subscales, with a small and medium effect size respectively, while no significant differences were found in the remaining subscales. Conclusion: We found that gender influences the scores obtained on the IRI scale by individuals from Buenos Aires. Women stood out compared to men in the tendency to identify with the actions and feelings of fictional characters, as well as the tendency to experience feelings of compassion and concern towards others, when they are in unfortunate situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Lucia Bacigalupe, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Psicología
    Psychology graduate, University of Buenos Aires, UBA scholarship holder. Research Institute, Faculty of Psychology
  • Paula Caamaño, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Psicología
    Psychology graduate and doctoral student from the University of Buenos Aires, UBA. UBACyT doctoral fellow. Research Institute, Faculty of Psychology
  • Samanta Leiva, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Psicología. CONICET
    Doctor and graduate in psychology from the University of Buenos Aires, UBA. CONICET postdoctoral fellow. Research Institute, Faculty of Psychology

References

REFERENCIAS

Bos, P. A., Hermans, E. J., Ramsey, N. F., & van Honk, J. (2012). The neural mechanisms by which testosterone acts on interpersonal trust. NeuroImage, 61(3), 730–737. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.002

Chen, W., Feng, H., Lv, C., & Lu, J. (2018). Relationships Between empathy, gender, and testosterone Levels in older adults. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(11), 1895–1908. doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6884

Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E. A., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 604–627. doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001

Clarke, M. J., Marks, A. D. G., & Lykins, A. D. (2015). Bridging the gap: the effect of gender normativity on differences in empathy and emotional intelligence. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(5), 522–539. doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1049246

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

Fernández, A. M., Dufey, M., & Kramp, U. (2011). Testing the psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) in Chile: Empathy in a different cultural context. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 179–185. doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000065

Filipetti, V. A., López, M. B., y Richaud, M. C. (2012). Aproximación neuropsicológica al constructo de empatía: aspectos cognitivos y neuroanatómicos. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología/Panamerican Journal of Neuropsychology, 6(1), 63-83. doi.org/10.7714/cnps/6.1.204

Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. doi.org/10.1037/a0024338

Garcia-Barrera, M. A., Karr, J. E., Trujillo-Orrego, N., Trujillo-Orrego, S., & Pineda, D. A. (2017). Evaluating empathy in Colombian ex-combatants: Examination of the internal structure of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) in Spanish. Psychological Assessment, 29(1), 116–122. doi.org/10.1037/pas0000331

Lachmann, B., Sindermann, C., Sariyska, R. Y., Luo, R., Melchers, M. C., Becker, B., … Montag, C. (2018). The Role of Empathy and Life Satisfaction in Internet and Smartphone Use Disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 398. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00398

León, O. G., y Montero, I. (2020). Métodos de investigación en psicología y educación. Las tradiciones cuantitativa y cualitativa (4º ed. revisada). McGraw-Hill.

Löffler, C. S., & Greitemeyer, T. (2021). Are women the more empathetic gender? The effects of gender role expectations. Current Psychology. doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01260-8

McDonald, S. (2013). Impairments in Social Cognition Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19(03), 231–246. doi.org/10.1017/S1355617712001506

Mestre Escrivá, V., Frías Navarro, M. D., y Samper García, P. (2004). La medida de la empatía: análisis del Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Psicothema, 16(2), 255-260.

Müller, M., Ungaretti, J., y Etchezahar, E. (2015). Evaluación multidimensional de la empatía: Adaptación del Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al contexto argentino. Revista de Investigación en Psicología Social, 3(1), 42-53.

Nanda, S. (2013). Are there gender differences in empathy? Undergraduate Journal of Psychology at Berkeley, VII, 28–34. Recuperado de: https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~ujpb/assets/pdf/vol7.pdf#page=40

Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2008). Evaluación de la empatía en población infantil argentina. Revista de investigación en psicología, 11(1), 101-115. Recuperado de: https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/76148

Rogers, K., Dziobek, I., Hassenstab, J., Wolf, O., & Convit, A. (2007). Who cares? Revisiting empathy in Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(4), 709–715. doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0197-8

RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL https://www.rstudio.com/

Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2015). The neuropsychology of empathy: Evidence from lesion studies. Revue de Neuropsychologie, Neurosciences Cognitives et Cliniques, 7(4), 237–243. doi.org/10.3917/rne.074.0237

Urquiza, V., y Casullo, M. M. (2006). Empatía, razonamiento moral y conducta prosocial en adolescentes. Anuario de Investigaciones, XIII, 297-302. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369139942031

Volman, I., Toni, I., Verhagen, L., & Roelofs, K. (2011). Endogenous Testosterone Modulates Prefrontal-Amygdala Connectivity during Social Emotional Behavior. Cerebral Cortex, 21(10), 2282–2290. doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr001

Yang, C.-Y., Decety, J., Lee, S., Chen, C., & Cheng, Y. (2009). Gender differences in the mu rhythm during empathy for pain: An electroencephalographic study. Brain Research, 1251, 176–184. doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.062

Published

2023-01-02

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS

How to Cite

INTERPERSONAL REACTIVITY INDEX: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PERFORMANCE AMONG MEN AND WOMEN FROM BUENOS AIRES. (2023). PSICOLOGÍA UNEMI, 7(12), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2602-8379vol7iss12.2023pp35-44p