A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW STUDY OF ENACTMENT FROM PSYCHOANALYSIS
Abstract
Abstract: The present study aims to carry out a systematic review about the uses of the enactment concept in scientific articles published between 2020 and 2021. The systematic review, carried out according to the PRISMA declaration, was carried out in January 2022, with 44 scientific articles being selected. from 8 databases. Based on the results obtained, enactment is used in specifically psychoanalytic scientific articles and its uses vary depending on the various theoretical approaches that this discipline presents. Despite this, while enactment defines a specific clinical situation that challenges both the patient and the therapist, it is that, beyond the epistemological difficulties of the construct, it remains within the fundamental concepts of psychoanalytic technique. The need to continue with the research that has been carried out is pointed out, opening new lines towards empirical clinical studies.Downloads
References
REFERENCIAS
Barahona, R. (2020). Living the Non-Dream: An Examination of the Links Between Dreaming, Enactment, and Transformations in hallucinosis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 89, 689-714.
Bernardi, R. (2015). What kind of discipline is psychoanalysis? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96(3), 731-754. 10.1111/1745-8315.12351.
Bohleber, W. (2013). The concept of intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis: Taking critical stock. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 94(4), 799-823. 10.1111/1745-8315.12021.
*Bohleber, W., Fonagy, P., Jiménez, J. P., Scarfone, D., Varvin, S., & Zysman, S. (2013). Towards a better use of psychoanalytic concepts: A model illustrated using the concept of enactment. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 94(3), 501-530. 10.1111/1745-8315.12075.
*Cassorla, R. (2001). Acute enactment as a “resource” in disclousing a collusion between the analytic dyad. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82(6), 1155-1170. 10.1516/k79g-fdw3-jfq3-5fcn.
*Cassorla, R. (2005). From bastion to enactment: The “non-dream” in the theatre of analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86(3), 699-719. 10.1516/rr33-a8fh-v4rb-cdxj.
*Cassorla, R. (2008). The analyst's implicit alpha-function, trauma and enactment in the analysis of borderline patients]. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89(1), 161-180. 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2007.00018.x.
*Cassorla, R. (2010). Del baluarte al “enactment”: “el no-sueño” en el teatro del análisis. Revista de Psicoanálisis, 67(1/2), 137-161.
*Cassorla, R. (2012). What happens before and after acute enactments? An exercise in clinical validation and the broadening of hypotheses. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 93(1), 53-80. 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00506.x
Civitarese, G. (2021). Intersubjectivity And Analytic Field Theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 69, 853-893.
*Corbella, V. (2017). Enactment: una revisión necesaria. Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad del Salvador. https://racimo.usal.edu.ar/id/eprint/6808.
*Corbella, V. (2021). Enactment: A necessary conceptual review. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 102(1),51-67. 10.1080/00207578.2020.1796490.
Daurella, N. (2018) Transferencia y contratransferencia desde la perspectiva del psicoanálisis relacional: a la búsqueda de la responsividad óptima. Aperturas Psicoanalíticas 59. http://aperturas.org/articulo.php?articulo=0001041.
Delboy, S. (2020). A Country of Two: Race and Social Class in an Immigrant Therapeutic Dyad. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 30, 90-101.
Dobrich, J. (2020). An Elegy for Motherless Daughters: Dissociation, Multiplicity, and Mourning. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 17, 366-384.
Frank, K. A. (2020). Rethinking Therapeutic Action: Finding Commonalty in Diversity. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 17, 289-317.
Fonagy, P. (2015). Research issues in psychoanalysis. [Cuestiones de investigación en psicoanálisis]. En M. Leuzinger-Bohleber & H. Kächele (Eds.), An Open Door Review of Outcome and Process Studies in Psychoanalysis (3ª ed., pp. 18-32.). http://www.ipa.world/IPA/en/What_is_Psychoanalysis/Open_Door_Review/en/Psychoanalytic_Theory/Research/open_door.aspx?hkey=fade476a-ae81-48b3-8fab-280070a69bf6&iSession=66c24d9d84ca4a24b80d4d442278c142,-1%27.
*Fulgencio, L. (2020). Incommensurability between paradigms, revolutions and common ground in the development of psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 101, 13-4.
Gerhardt, J. (2020). The Traumatic No Man’s Land of Psychic Devastation: Beyond Mourning and Melancholia. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 17, 84-106.
Graver, R. (2020). Emerging From Deadness: A Microanalysis of the Analytic Relationship. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 68, 59-82.
Green, A. (2010). El pensamiento clínico. Amorrortu.
Grier, F. (2020). The case of J: Working as a psychoanalyst during the Pandemic. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 101, 778-783.
*Ivey, G. (2008). Enactment controversies: A critical review of current debates. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89(1), 19-38. 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2007.00003.x.
*Jacobs, T. J. (1986). On Countertransference Enactments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 34(2), 289-307. 10.1177/000306518603400203.
*Jacobs, T. J. (1999). Countertransference past and present. A review of the concept. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 80(3), 575-594.
*Jacobs, T. J. (2013). The Possible Profession: The Analytic Process of Change. Routledge.
Jiménez, J. P. (2004). Validez y validación del método psicoanalítico. Alegato sobre la necesidad del pluralismo metodológico y pragmático en psicoanálisis. http://www.aperturas.org/articulos.php?id=0000309&a=Validez-y-validacion-del-metodo-psicoanalitico-Alegato-sobre-la-necesidad-del-pluralismo-metodologico-y-pragmatico-en-psicoanalisis-Alegato-sobre-la-necesidad-de-pluralismo-metodologico-y-pragmatico-en-psicoanalisis.
Kwalwasser, L. (2020). Whose Envy Is It Anyway? Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 30, 666-681.
*Krakov, H. (2010, septiembre). Estudio sobre el concepto de agieren. Trabajo presentado en el Congreso de la Federación Psicoanalítica de América Latina, Bogotá, Colombia.
Lerner, R. (2021). Violence in infancy and its relationship with perverse aspects in the development of a child. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 102, 543-559.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2015). Development of a plurality during the one-hundred-year-old history of research of psychoanalysis. En M. Leuzinger-Bohleber & H. Kächele (Eds.), An Open Door Review of Outcome and Process Studies in Psychoanalysis (3ª ed., pp. 18-32.). http://www.ipa.world/IPA/en/What_is_Psychoanalysis/Open_Door_Review/en/Psychoanalytic_Theory/Research/open_door.aspx?hkey=fade476a-ae81-48b3-8fab-.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. & Fischmann, T. (2006). What is conceptual research in psychoanalysis? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(5), 1355-1386. 10.1516/73MU-E53N-D1EE-1Q8L.
Levine, H. B. (2021). Trauma, process and representation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 102, 794-807.
*Lynch, A., Bachant, J., & Richards, A. (2020). The Spectrum of Analytic Interaction: A Contemporary Freudian Perspective. Psychoanalytic Review, 107, 435-455.
*Maldonado, J. L. (2015). Considerações sobre a realidade externa no enactment. Revista de Psicanalisé, 22(3), 559-572. http://revista.sppa.org.br/index.php/RPdaSPPA/article/viewFile/210/297
*McLaughlin, J. T. (1998). Clinical and Theoreticals Aspects of Enactments. En S. J. Ellman & M. Moskowitz (Eds.), Enactment. Toward a New Approach to the Therapeutic Relationship (pp. 77-89). Jason Aronson.
*Maroda, K. J. (2020). Deconstructing Enactment. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 37, 8-17.
Medina, M. (2021). From Imagination to Information: Therapist’s Curiosity and Voyeurism in the Age of Social Media. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 57, 115-124.
*Moreno, E. (2000). A propósito del concepto de enactment. http://www.aperturas.org/articulos.php?id=0000111&a=A-proposito-del-concepto-de-enactment.
Munive-Rojas, S. y Gutiérrez-Garibay, M. (2015). ¿Cómo realizar una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis? Revista de cardiología del Cuerpo Médico del Instituto Nacional Cardiovascular, 2, 32-37. https://es.readkong.com/page/como-realizar-una-revision-sistematica-y-meta-analisis-2397601.
Munné, F. (2004). El retorno de la complejidad y la nueva imagen del ser humano: Hacia una psicología compleja. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 38(1), 23-31.
Novack, D. (2021). “It Takes a Village”: Concurrent Eating Disorder Treatment and the Multiperson Field. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 31, 181-196.
*Offman, H. (2020). The Otherness of Fat: An Intersectional Enactment of Epic Proportions. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 17, 342-365.
*Paz, C. A. (2007). Del “agieren” al “enactment”, un siglo de cambios y avances. Revista de Psicoanálisis de Madrid, 50, 59-71.
*Perelberg, R. J. (2003), Panel on ‘acting out and/or enactment’. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84(1), 151–155. 10.1516/9g6k-rnrm-b5mx-7gmk.
Rodríguez Sutil, C. (2007). Epistemología del psicoanálisis relacional. Clínica e investigación relacional, 1(1), 9-41. http://psicoterapiarelacional.com/Portals/0/eJournalCeIR/V1N1/1_Rodriguez%20Sutil_Epistemologia%20del%20Psicoanalisis%20Relacional_CeIR_V1N1_2007.pdf.
Sampaio, M. y Camarotti, M.C. (2020). Fenómenos primitivos del campo analítico. Estilos da clínica, 25(3), 488-500.
*Sapisochin, G. (2007). Variaciones post-freudianas de agieren: Sobre la escucha de lo puesto en acto. Revista de Psicoanálisis de Madrid, 50, 73-102.
*Sapisochin, G. (2013). Seconds thoughts on agieren: listening to the enacted. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 94(5), 967-91. 10.1111/1745-8315.12095.
*Sapisochin, G. (2014). Dialogando con D.W.Winnicott. Reflexiones sobre la escucha del enactment. Revista de Psicoanálisis de Madrid, 71, 257-280.
*Sassenfeld, A. (2010). Enactments: Una perspectiva relacional sobre vínculo, acción e inconsciente. Revista electrónica de Clínica e Investigación Relacional, 4(1),142-181. http://www.psicoterapiarelacional.es/Portals/0/eJournalCeIR/V4N1_2010/09_A_Sassenfeld_Enactments_2010_CeIR_V4N1.pdf
Sheehy, J. E. (2021). The Goldilocks Function: Eating Disorders, Object Usage, and the Third. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 57, 306-326
Slochower, J. (2021). A Few Regrets. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 31, 166-180
Starr, K. E. (2020). Summoning Spirits, Bridging Worlds: Writing, Dreaming, Working Through. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 17, 205-221.
*Steiner, J. (2000). Containment, enactment and communication. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81(2), 245-255.
*Steiner, J. (2006). Interpretative enactment and the analytic setting. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(2), 315-320. 10.1516/f283-h4rj-x1dt-gf35.
Stern, D. B. (2020). Field Theory and the Dream Sense: Continuing the Comparison of Interpersonal/Relational Theory and Bionian Field Theory. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 30, 538-553.
Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (2013). Deconstruyendo el mito del analista neutral: Una alternativa desde la teoría de los sistemas intersubjetivos. Revista Electrónica de Clínica e Investigación Relacional, 7(1), 60-74. http://www.psicoterapiarelacional.es/Portals/0/eJournalCeIR/V7N1_2013/05_Stolorow-Atwood_Deconstruyendo%20el%20Mito%20del%20Analista%20Neutral_[1997]_CeIR_V7N1.pdf
Theodorou Ehrlich, L. (2020). The case of J: Working as a psychoanalyst during the Pandemic. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 101, 791-796.
Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina clínica, 135(11), 507-511.
Zachrisson, A. & Zachrisson, H. D. (2005). Validation on psychoanalytic theories: Towards a conceptualization of references. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86(5), 1373- 1371. 10.1516/FVGK-FJN3-V3D1-JRF8.
Zuckerfeld, R. (2009). La noción de muestra en psicoanálisis. Subjetividad y procesos cognitivos, 13(2), 247-262. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1852-73102009000200008.
Copyright (c) 2022 PSICOLOGÍA UNEMI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los artículos de la Revista FACSalud UNEMI son difundidos bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor, y, por lo tanto, son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes: Reconocer los créditos de la obra especificada por el autor e indicar si se realizaron cambios (puede hacerlo de cualquier forma razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que el autor respalda el uso que hace de su obra. No utilizar la obra para fines comerciales. En caso de remezcla, transformación o desarrollo, no puede distribuirse el material modificado.
