REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE LA PREPARACIÓN PARA DESASTRES EN EL CONTEXTO DE LA PANDEMIA COVID-19.

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2602-8379vol6iss11.2022pp87-109p

Palabras clave:

Revisión sistemática, Preparación para desastres, COVID-19

Resumen

RESUMEN: Los impactos de COVID-19 y las medidas para controlarlo plantean aún más preguntas sobre la preparación para desastres que abarca el conocimiento y las capacidades desarrolladas por gobiernos, organizaciones, comunidades e individuos para anticipar, responder y recuperarse de los impactos de desastres probables, inminentes o actuales. Este estudio tiene como objetivo analizar las publicaciones realizadas entre 2020 y 2021 sobre la preparación para desastres en el contexto de la pandemia COVID-19. Por tanto, utiliza la Revisión Sistemática, de tal forma que encaja como multidisciplinar, abarcando, en particular, las áreas de las Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, a partir de un conjunto teórico-conceptual para dar respuesta al objetivo propuesto. Se siguieron los pasos de calidad del método PRISMA-NMA, de tal manera que se analizaron 27 artículos científicos publicados en el período de 2020 a 2021, con acceso al texto completo, publicados en el área de las ciencias humanas, sociales y multidisciplinarias, y cuyo objeto de investigación esté relacionado con la preparación para desastres. De los 27 artículos seleccionados para esta Revisión Sistemática, 66,7 % hacen sus inferencias a partir de una revisión de la literatura, 70,4 % aborden directamente temas relacionados con las políticas públicas y solo 7,4 % abordan temas relacionados con la salud mental de los involucrados en desastres. La salud mental de las personas involucradas en desastres sigue siendo un tema poco desarrollado en los estudios sobre preparación para desastres. La formulación de políticas públicas requiere la capacidad de implementar una estrategia coherente para proteger a las poblaciones.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • João Luiz da Matta Felisberto, 55 31 985762617

    Postdoctorado en Psicología de la Universidad de Flores, Argentina - línea de investigación “Revisión de métodos de investigación” (en curso); Doctorado en Administración de la Universidad FUMEC, Brasil - línea de investigación “Gestión Estratégica de Organizaciones” (2020); Maestría en Administración de la Universidad FUMEC, Brasil - línea de investigación “Gestión Estratégica de Organizaciones” (2015). Especialización en Seguridad Pública de la Fundação João Pinheiro (2014). Especialización en Derecho Civil de la Faculdades Integradas Jacarepaguá (2009).

Referencias

REFERENCIAS

*Afrin, S., Chowdhury, F. J., y Rahman, M. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic: rethinking strategies for resilient urban design, perceptions, and planning. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3 (668263), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.668263.

*Allen, A., Sarmiento, J. P., y Sandoval, V. (2020). Los estudios latinoamericanos de reducción del riesgo de desastres en el contexto de la pandemia del COVID-19. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos sobre Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres, 4 (2), 1-6. http://revistareder.com/handle-0719-8477-2020-066.

*Aven, T., y Zio, E. (2021). Globalization and global risk: how risk analysis needs to be enhanced to be effective in confronting current threats. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 205 (107270), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107270.

Azadegan, A., Parast, M. M., Lucianetti, L., Nishant, R., y Blackhurst, J. (2020). Supply chain disruptions and business continuity: an empirical assessment. Decision Sciences, 51 (1), 38-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12395.

Azevedo, N. H., y Scarpa, D. L. (2017). Revisão Sistemática de trabalhos sobre concepções de natureza da ciência no ensino de ciências. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 17 (2), 579-619. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2017172579.

Benight, C. C., Harwell, A., y Shoji, K. (2018). Self-regulation shift theory: a dynamic personal agency approach to recovery capital and methodological suggestions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (1738), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01738.

Chandler, D. (2014). Beyond neoliberalism: resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 2 (1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.878544.

*Chatterjee, R., Bajwa, S., Dwivedi, D., Kanji, R., Ahammed, M., y Shaw, R. (2020). COVID-19 Risk Assessment Tool: Dual application of risk communication and risk governance. Progress in Disaster Science, 7 (100109), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100109.

*Cheshmehzangi, A. (2021). Revisiting the built environment: 10 potential development changes and paradigm shifts due to COVID-19. Journal of Urban Management, 10 (2), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2021.01.002.

Chiossi, S., Tsolova, S., y Ciotti, M. (2021). Assessing public health emergency preparedness: A scoping review on recent tools and methods. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 56 (102104), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102104.

*Cole, H. D., Cole, M. J., Simpson, K. J., Simpson, N. P., Ziervogel, G., y New, M. G. (2021). Managing city-scale slow-onset disasters: learning from Cape Town's 2015–2018 drought disaster planning. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63 (102459), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102459.

Crosweller, M., y Tschakert, P. (2021). Disaster management and the need for a reinstated social contract of shared responsibility. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63 (102440), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102440.

Djalante, R., Nurhidayah, L., Minh, H. V., Phuong, N. T. N., Mahendradhata, Y., Trias, A., Lassa, J., y Miller, M. A. (2020a). COVID-19 and Asean responses: comparative policy analysis. Progress in Disaster Science, 8 (100129), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100129.

*Djalante, R., Shaw, R., y DeWit, A. (2020). Building resilience against biological hazards and pandemics: COVID-19 and its implications for the Sendai Framework. Progress in Disaster Science, 6 (100080), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100080.

Etinay, N., Egbu, C., y Murray, V. (2018). Building urban resilience for disaster risk management and disaster risk reduction. Procedia Engineering, 212 (2018), 575-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.074.

*Fakhruddin, B., Clark, H., Robinson, L., y Hieber-Girardet, L. (2020). Should I stay or should I go now? Why risk communication is the critical component in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Disaster Science, 8 (100139), 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100139.

Fakhruddin, B., Reinen-Hamil, R., y Robertson, R. (2019). Extent and evaluation of vulnerability for disaster risk reduction of urban Nuku'alofa, Tonga. Progress in Disaster Science, 2 (100017), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100017.

*Farhoud, M., Shah, S., Stenholm, P., Kibler, E., Renko, M., y Terjensen, S. (2021). Social enterprise crowdfunding in an acute crisis. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15 (e00211), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00211.

Faro, A., Bahiano, M. A., Nakano, T. C., Reis, C., Silva, B. F. P., y Vitti, L. S. (2020). COVID-19 e saúde mental: a emergência do cuidado. Estudos de Psicologia, 37 (e200074), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202037e200074.

Felisberto, J. L. M. (2021). Ensino na preparação para desastres: análise de satisfação. Revista Atlante: Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, 13(6), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.51896/atlante/PHIL8214.

Felisberto, J. L. M., Rezende, P. R. B., y Pardini, D. J. (2019). Políticas públicas de gestión en protección y defensa civil: el modelo de Cedec/MG. Anais do Cuarto Congreso Virtual Internacional Desarrollo Económico, Social y Empresarial en Iberoamérica, Málaga, Espanha. https://www.eumed.net/actas/19/desarrollo-empresarial/41-politicas-publicas-de-gestion-en-proteccion-y-defensa-civil-el-modelo-de-cedecmg.pdf.

*Fior, M., y Mpampatsikos, V. (2021). COVID-19 and estimates of actual deaths in Italy. Scenarios for urban planning in Lombardy. Journal of Urban Management, 10 (3), 275-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2021.06.008.

Fuentelsaz, L., González, C., y Maicas, J. P. (2019). Formal institutions and opportunity entrepreneurship. The contingent role of informal institutions. Business Research Quarterly, 22 (1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.06.002.

*Govindan, K., Mina, H., y Alavi, B. (2020). A decision support system for demand management in healthcare supply chains considering the epidemic outbreaks: a case study of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 138 (101967), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101967.

*Hemmonsbey, J., Tichaawa, T. M., y Knott, B. (2021). Strategic Conceptualisation of the South African Sport Tourism Sector’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 10 (1), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.46222/ajhtl.19770720-86.

Hutton, B., Catalá-López, F., y Moher, D. (2016). La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA. Medicina Clínica, 147 (6), 262-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02.025.

Izumi, T., Shaw, R., Djalante, R., Ishiwatari, M., y Komino, T. (2019). Disaster risk reduction and innovations. Progress in Disaster Science, 2 (100033), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100033.

Koehler, J., Rayner, S., Katuva, J., Thomson, P., y Hope, R. (2018). A cultural theory of drinking water risks, values and institutional change. Global Environmental Change, 50 (2018), 268-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.006.

*Leach, M., MacGregor, H., Scoones, I., y Wilkinson, A. (2021). Post-pandemic transformations: how and why COVID-19 requires us to rethink development. World Development, 138 (105233), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105233.

Megahed, N. A., y Ghoneim, E. M. (2020). Antivirus-built environment: lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61 (102350), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102350.

Mische, S., y Wilkerson, A. (2016). Disaster and contingency planning for scientific shared resource cores. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques, 27 (1), 4-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.7171%2Fjbt.16-2701-003.

Mohammed, M. (2018). Disaster risk reduction and management of Tarlac City. Procedia Engineering, 212 (2018), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.011.

*Nakano, T. C. (2020). Crises, desastres naturais e pandemias: contribuições da Psicologia Positiva. Ciencias Psicicológicas, 14 (2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v14i2.2161.

*Nhamo, G., Kandawasvika, G. Q., y Sibanda, M. (2020). Non-pharmaceutical strategies win coronavirus disease 2019 battle in New Zealand. Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 12 (1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4102/ jamba.v12i1.1010.

Nyanga, E. (2018). Disaster preparedness and management at the national archives and the National Library of Namibia. Africa Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 28 (1), 77-91. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajlais/article/view/174153.

Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., y Stevens, D. (2015). SQUIRE 2.0 Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46 (11), 501-507. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20151020-02.

Pardini, D. J., Felisberto, J. L. M., y Goecking, O. H. P. (2018). Pressões institucionais e respostas estratégicas na gestão de barragens minerais: Análise da percepção de gestores de um órgão público mineiro. Revista Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana, noviembre (2018), 1-15. https://www.eumed.net/rev/oel/2018/11/gestao-barragens-minerais.html.

Rahman, M. H., Zafri, N. M., Ashik, F. R., Waliullah, M., y Khan, A. (2021). Identification of risk factors contributing to COVID-19 incidence rates in Bangladesh: a GIS-based spatial modeling approach. Heliyon, 7 (2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06260.

Raikes, J., Smith, T. F., Jacobson, C., y Baldwin, C. (2019). Pre-disaster planning and preparedness for floods and droughts: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 38, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101207.

Raju, E., y Niekerk, D. V. (2020). Why do the impacts of coronavirus disease 2019 and the response surprise the world? Jambá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 12 (1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.4102/ jamba.v12i1.1028.

*Ritchie, L., y Gill, D. (2021). Considering COVID-19 through the lens of hazard and disaster research. Social Sciences, 10 (248), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10070248.

*Rittichainuwat, B., Laws, E., Maunchontham, R., Rattanaphinanchai, S., Muttamara, S., Mouton, K., Lin, Y., y Suksai, C. (2020). Resilience to crises of Thai MICE stakeholders: a longitudinal study of the destination image of Thailand as a MICE destination. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35 (100704), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100704.

Rivera, J. D., Ceesay, A. A., y Sillah, A. (2020). Challenges to disaster risk management in the Gambia: a preliminary investigation of the disaster management system’s structure. Progress in Disaster Science, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100075.

Rivera, J. D. (2016). Organizational structure and collaboration: emergency management agencies and their choice to work with voluntary organizations in planning. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy, 7 (4), 160-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12105.

*Roche, J. R. F., Moré, S. I., y García, A. M. G. (2021). Psicología, adicciones y COVID-19: lecciones aprendidas para la recuperación y afrontamiento a otras situaciones críticas. Anales de la Academia de Ciencias de Cuba, 11 (1), 1-11. http://www.revistaccuba.cu/index.php/revacc/article/view/902/1005.

*Rodrigues, K. F., Carpes, M. M., y Raffagnato, C. G. (2020). Preparação e resposta a desastres do Brasil na pandemia da COVID-19. Revista de Administração Pública, 54 (4), 614-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200291.

*Sakamoto, M., Sasaki, D., Ono, Y., Makino, Y., y Kodama, E. N. (2020). Implementation of evacuation measures during natural disasters under conditions of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic based on a review of previous responses to complex disasters in Japan. Progress in Disaster Science, 8 (100127), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100127.

*Schmid, B., Raju, E., y Jensen, P. K. M. (2021). COVID-19 and business continuity - learning from the private sector and humanitarian actors in Kenya. Progress in Disaster Science, 11 (100181), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100181.

Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., Ely, A., Olsson, P., Laura, P., Priya, R., Zwanenberg, P., y Yang, L. (2020). Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42 (2020), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.004.

*Serrano, F., y Kazda, A. (2020). Business continuity during pandemics – lessons learned about airport personnel. Transportation Research Procedia, 51 (2020), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.11.008.

Sheehan, M. C., y Fox, M. A. (2020). Early warnings: the lessons of COVID-19 for public health climate preparedness. International Journal of Health Services, 50 (3), 264-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020731420928971.

UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2019). Terminology on disaster risk reduction. Autor. https://www.undrr.org/terminology.

UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 – World Conference on natural disaster reduction. Sendai: Autor. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf.

*Venter, Z. S., Barton, D. N., Gundersen, V., Figari, H., y Nowell, M. S. (2021). Back to nature: norwegians sustain increased recreational use of urban green space months after the COVID-19 outbreak. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214 (104175), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104175.

Vicari, R., Tchiguirinskaia, I., Tisserand, B., y Schertzer, D. (2019). Climate resilience in Paris: a network representation of online strategic documents released by public authorities. Progress in Disaster Science, 3 (100040), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100040.

*Workie, E., Mackolil, J., Nyika, J., y Ramadas, S. (2020). Deciphering the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on food security, agriculture, and livelihoods: a review of the evidence from developing countries. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2 (100014), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2020.100014.

*Yurisch, K. A., Soto, K. R., y Fuenzalida, C. R. (2020). COVID-19: network effectiveness of intermunicipal self-organized response in Chile. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Special Issue (2020), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.SI2020.1.

*Zhang, J., Hayashi, Y., y Frank, L. D. (2021). COVID-19 and transport: findings from a world-wide expert survey. Transport Policy, 103 (2021), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.011.

*Zhang, J. (2020). Transport policymaking that accounts for COVID-19 and future public health threats: a pass approach. Transport Policy, 99 (2020), 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.09.009.

Descargas

Publicado

2022-07-01

Número

Sección

ARTÍCULOS

Cómo citar

REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE LA PREPARACIÓN PARA DESASTRES EN EL CONTEXTO DE LA PANDEMIA COVID-19. (2022). PSICOLOGÍA UNEMI, 6(11), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2602-8379vol6iss11.2022pp87-109p